Friday, November 23, 2012

10. 'Efficient Government' an oxymoron?

Many Canadians might be tempted to readily agree. The infamous 1998 $750 M purchase of four used British diesel submarines that are all sitting in dry dock comes to mind. A federal fund meant to give impoverished veterans a dignified burial that has rejected over two-thirds of the applications strikes a chord. A Canadian Member of Parliament qualifying for a pension after serving for a mere six years rankles the sensibilities.
Many more examples could be touted but one must take a balanced, honest approach in examining this idea. As in describing 'intelligence' and accepting the variety of types of ability, we must accede that there exist a variety of 'government efficiencies'.

Efficiency in use of language by government is obvious on a regular basis. Any group that can effectively disguise a tax increase as 'fourth quarter equity retreat' and worker layoffs as 'initiating a career alternative enhancement program' has obviously mastered efficient semantics.

Long range planning is a natural skill governments have honed. An excellent example from the provincial level is MLAs voting themselves a twenty percent pay raise BEFORE slashing all public sector pay, including their own, by five percent as an austerity measure. Creation of paid committees that never met by the same government was a superb example of efficiency in action... no minutes, no resolutions, no recommendations, no follow-up and not a single minute wasted.

Transportation has been streamlined as well. Government are quick to commandeer aircraft to deliver them to 5 star hotels for various nonpolitical functions. Delivery of personal vehicles intercontinentally via armed forces aircraft is not made overly public to save economic strain for the host country is an excellent of efficiency crossing international boundaries.

I submit that while every political undertaking, due to human involvement, has a measure of inefficiency, we must never lose sight of the aforementioned efficiencies that do exist.

No comments:

Post a Comment